As has become customary over the last 10 years, the main conference of DiGS24 will be preceded by a one-day thematic workshop. Following up on an earlier pre-DiGS workshop in 2017, in 2023 we will revisit the theme of language contact, in particular in the domain of syntactic change.
Date: July 4, 2023
Place: Paris, France
Invited speaker: Metin Bağrıaçık (Boğaziçi University)
Description of the workshop
Although it is generally accepted that language contact is a major cause of language change, there is no theoretical consensus about the status of contact-induced grammar change, especially where syntactic change is concerned. On the one hand, whereas functional and typologically-oriented studies on language change have widely explored the role of contact in all domains of the grammar (see, among many others, Thomason & Kaufmann 1988; Kroch & Taylor 1997; Winford 2005; Mufwene 2008; Kuteva 2017; Matras 2020; Roberts 2021: ch. 5), it is often difficult to make a strong empirical case for language contact as the primary cause of a particular instance of change, and relatedly, to evaluate the validity of alternative, language-internal explanations (for one particular case study, see Bağrıaçık & Danckaert 2022). Similarly, whereas theoretical modeling of phonological change through language contact has been overall successful (see most notably Van Coetsem 1988), there are but a few formal studies of contact-induced syntactic change (see Lucas 2012 and Aboh 2015). The picture that emerges is one where contact-induced syntactic change is an elusive notion which resists formalization. As a result, as of yet, there is no integrated formal theory of syntactic change through language contact.
Conversely, the last two decades have witnessed a strong interest in the generative community in a number of specialized topics related to contact-induced syntactic change, such as the grammar of heritage languages (Polinsky 2018), code switching/code mixing (Muysken 2000), bilingualism (Kupisch & Polinsky 2022), L2-acquisition (Walkden & Breitbarth 2019) and creole studies (DeGraff 1999; Aboh & DeGraff 2017). The leading question of the workshop ‘Formal Approaches to Language Contact’ is to explore how recent advances in the above-mentioned research areas can be integrated into a more general formal theory of contact-induced syntactic change. Specific issues that could be addressed at the workshop include the following:
- In spite of claims to the opposite (Lightfoot 1979: 381-385), do language-external factors like diglossia and language contact play a role in diachronic processes?
- Does syntactic borrowing exist at all, and if so, how can it be diagnosed empirically? Alternatively, is it the case that syntactic features of a grammar cannot be borrowed, and that what looks like pattern borrowing is in fact borrowing of functional vocabulary items (a claim that ties in well with certain Chomskyan assumptions about the nature of syntax and parametric variation)?
- Alternatively, is it the case that there are no principled constraints on what aspects of a language can be borrowed (Thomason & Kaufmann 1988)?
- What does a formal theory of contact-induced syntactic change have to account for? To what extent are contact-induced syntactic changes different from syntactic changes that are due to other factors?
- Assuming that contact-induced syntactic borrowing exists, what exactly can be borrowed? Is it constructions/syntactic schemata, or rather more abstract properties, like formal features or parameter settings?
We invite abstracts for 30 minute presentations (followed by 10 minutes of questions) on any of these issues, with a particular focus on theoretical modeling of contact-induced syntactic change. Abstracts should be no longer than two pages A4, with minimally 1-inch margins. Submissions are restricted to one per (co)-author. Further information will in due time be published on the conference website
The language of the conference is English.
Abstracts are to be submitted in pdf-format via the EasyAbs system, at http://linguistlist.org/easyabs/DiGS2023.
Submission deadline: February 10, 2023 (23.59 GMT+1)
Notification of acceptance: March 10, 2023
References
- Aboh, Enoch. 2015. The emergence of hybrid grammars: language contact and change. Cambridge: CUP.
- Aboh, Enoch & Michel DeGraff. 2017. A null theory of creole formation based on Universal Grammar. In: Roberts, I. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford: OUP, 401-458.
- Bağrıaçık, Metin & Lieven Danckaert. 2022. Raising and matching in Pharasiot Greek relative clauses: a diachronic reconstruction, Journal of Linguistics 58, 495-533.
- Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor. 1997. Verb movement in Old and Middle English: dialect variation and language contact. In: van Kemenade, A. & N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change. Cambridge: CUP, 297-325.
- Kupisch, Tanja & Maria Polinsky. 2022. Language history on fast forward: innovations in heritage languages and diachronic change, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 25, 1-12.
- Kuteva, Tania. 2017. Contact and borrowing. In: Ledgeway, A. & I. Roberts (eds.), Cambridge handbook of historical syntax, Cambridge: CUP, 163-185.
- Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: CUP.
- Lucas, Christopher. 2012. Contact-induced grammatical change: towards an explicit account, Diachronica 29, 275-300.
- Matras, Yaron. 20202. Language contact (second edition). Cambridge: CUP.
- Mufwene, Salikoko. 2008. Language evolution: contact, competition and change. London: Continuum.
- Muysken, Pieter. 2000. Bilingual speech: a typology of code-mixing. Cambridge: CUP.
- Polinsky, Maria. 2018. Heritage languages and their speakers. Cambridge: CUP.
- Roberts, Ian. 2021. Diachronic syntax (second edition). Oxford: OUP.
- Thomason, Sarah & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- van Coetsem, Frans. 1988. Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Dordrecht: Foris.
- Walkden, George & Anne Breitbarth. 2019. Complexity as L2-difficulty: implications for syntactic change, Theoretical Linguistics 45, 183-209.
- Winford, Donald. 2005. Contact-induced changes: classification and processes, Diachronica 22, 373-427.